-
|
How
the UN's Neutrality Props Up Evil Regimes
FIRE
LOUISE ARBOUR!
Read
it and puke: KOFI'S ROLE IN THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE
"If ever there were a dog-bites-man story, 'UN
Stinkingly Corrupt Shock!' is it. ... One of the reasons I'm in favour
of small government is because big government tends to be remote government,
and remote government is unaccountable, and, as a wannabe world government,
the UN is the remotest and most unaccountable of all. ... there are millions
of global relationships far better for the long-term health of the planet
than using American money to set up Eurowimp talking shops manned by African
thugs -- which is what the UN Human Rights Commission boils down to."--
Mark
Steyn
If
bureaucracy and BS could fill an empty stomach, the UN could feed the world
"Negotiations
are not a substitute for force. When international negotiations work,
often it is because aggressors know what is going to happen if it doesn't
work."
-- Thomas Sowell Sometimes
it's better to do something than to argue with a third world debate club."
-- Shannon Allen
The
UN pretends it's going to reform
| The
UNserious UN
The
U.N. now feels free to act as America's dictator
The
UN finances terrorists
The
O.F.F. investigation starts...
The
UN is Morally BANKRUPT
How
the UN corrupts the concept of rights
The
UNs’ Oil for Food program scandal keeps growing
UN
chief Kofi Annan, France, Russia, China implicated in Saddam's
"Oil-For-Food"
scam.
And
guess who controls the O.F.F. investigation reporting?
The
bizarre fetish of United Nations "consenus"
Book
on U.N. scandals due out soon
"[Radical Islamism] is not a position with which Americans
can bargain or negotiate. With it there is no common ground -- not even
respect for life -- on which to begin a dialogue. It can only be destroyed
or utterly isolated." -- report of the 9/11 Commission
Iraqi
Official: "U.N. Failed us"
"The U.N. has no moral authority, especially where Iraq is concerned."-
James Taranto, HERE.
"The
liberal belief in the United Nations can no longer be said to have any
basis in reality; it has entered the realm of pure superstition." --
James Taranto, HEREOn
12/13/03 The New York Times advised: "Instead of driving
away France, Germany, Russia and Canada with financial sanctions, the president
should be creating the room for compromise that will lead to those countries'
sending money and troops to Iraq."
FACT: $35 BILLION OF THE MONEY IRAQ "OWED"
FRANCE, GERMANY AND RUSSIA WAS FOR ARMS
IN VIOLATION OF THE U.N. SANCTIONS.
Are we supposed to forgive, and thereby encourage, such perfidy and let
them in on the $18 Billion in rebuilding contracts?
See: "The New York Times reports that both
the United Nations and Najaf's Shiite clergymen had asked the U.S. not
to provide military protection [and both wound up being car-bombed].. The
arrogance and stupidity of the U.N. is especially striking; the Times
reports that it actually continued employing the same Baathist 'security
guards' -- actually spies for Saddam's regime -- it had used before liberation."
HERE
THE
UN IS PUSHING FOR CONTROL OF THE INTERNET
"One must be free from persecution for
one’s political views, from being arbitrarily imprisoned, or from having
one’s property seized. Such
rights are crucial to human life. Men cannot learn, make new discoveries,
forge long-range plans, or enjoy the rewards of their effort, if they live
under the constant threat of being looted, imprisoned, or murdered. ...
"In a truly Orwellian climax, the [U.N.'s] Declaration brazenly upholds,
as an example of man’s rights and freedoms, the individual’s duty to serve
the state." -- Robert W. Tracinski in The
U.N.'s Distortion of Rights
"Article 29 (3), [of the U.N.'s Declaration of
Human Rights] reads: 'These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised
contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.'
So, there you have it. Your right to live, your right to liberty,
your right to own property and to think as you please, your right to express
your opinions and to gather peacefully with others are all gone … eliminated
… if your exercise of those rights places you at odds with the purposes
and principles of the United Nations." -- Neal Boortz, HERE|
Pentagon:
The
UN is "irrelevant". Hooray!
Now it's the State Dept.'s turn. Well....?
WHY
INVADE IRAQ?
Syria's
Assad supports anti-coalition insurgents in Iraq
See:
The
9-11 Commission's stoneWALLing about the central role Gorelick played "is
getting ridiculous." HERE
Sowell
skewers the obscene
grandstanding-in-the-face-of-peril HERE.
DICK
CLARKE ON AMERICAN GRANDSTAND
Ex-Sen.
Slade Gorton asked the most to-the-point question of all: Could
the 9-11 attacks have been prevented if President Bush had implemented
each and every one of Clarke's recommendations immediately upon taking
office? "No," replied Clarke.
Clinton
appointed George Tenet as CIA Chief in July 1997, meaning that Tenet served
during the Clinton administration for three and a half years. But
Clinton saw Tenet only twice, in other words, a grand total of two (2)
times during that entire period, despite the first attack on the World
Trade Center and the ones on the Khobar Towers, the Cole and the embassies.
On the other hand, even though the new Bush administration was in office
only
about 8 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush received world-wide
intelligence reports on all terrorist threats, not just Al Qaeda's, from
Tenet himself, in person, well over FIFTY TIMES in that relatively
short time period. What does all THAT say about Richard Clarke's
claims and charges???? And did you know Clarke totally contradicted
himself HERE???
In October of 1998,
during the Clinton administration, the U.S. Senate passed The Iraq Liberation
Act, making it the official policy of the U.S. government to seek regime
change in Iraq. The vote was unanimous, including every Democrat in the
Senate, even Ted Kennedy.
"Those who now talk about a need for 'iron-clad proof'
are talking election-year nonsense when it comes to national survival.
When the planes flew into the World Trade Center, that was iron-clad proof.
When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, that was iron-clad proof. We cannot
wait for iron-clad proof in a nuclear age." -- Thomas Sowell, HERE
The pacificists'
arguments amount to saying: since these massive
threats were brought upon us by our very own foreign policy errors, this
means
(in their minds, anyway)
that we "therefore"
have no right or obligation to defuse those threats ourselves. Yeah,
right.
Despite the insistence of various
Democrats, butt-covering diplomats and other vacillators that it
had
to be due to years of international cooperation in (fruitless) sanctions
and diplomacy, Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi made it clear that
he
decided to disarm due to our terminating the regime in Iraq, NOT
Afghanistan:
"I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in
Iraq, and I was afraid," Gaddafi told Italy's Prime Minister
Berlusconi here
& HERE.
Gaddafi
urges rogue states: 'Follow my lead!' HERE.
See: "Niger is a former French
colony and its uranium mines are run by a French
company that comes under the control of the French
Atomic Energy Commission.".HERE
On Meet the Press 8-8-04 Condoleeza Rice told host
Tim Russert that Al Qaeda cased the embassies in Tanzania and Kenya FIVE
YEARS before blowing them up in 1998.
Shhh! "Democracy takes root beneath the turmoil in Iraq"
by Ayad Rahim is HERE.
|
Now's
not the time to go wobbly on the U.N., George!
|
"What a farce to have Cameroon
or Portugal deciding whether it is
OK for the United States to
go to war." -- Thomas Sowell, HERE
|
"In the febrile atmosphere sweeping the [U.N.] building
the whisper that Guinea would vote against the US on the advice of its
president's witch doctor provoked new excitement." -- Daily Telegraph (London),
March 14 quoted HERE. |
What's wrong with this picture? Cuba jails dissidents --and
gets re-elected the the UN Human Rights Commission. See the article
HERE.
|
|
|
"The United Nations isn't our 'best hope.' The United Nations is
our worst nightmare." -- Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, on the floor of
the House of Representatives, May 6, 2003.
|
"A
nation that violates the rights of its own citizens cannot claim any rights
whatsoever." -- Ayn Rand, HERE
|
|
WHY
liberals
keep trusting dictators--and why they have to.
|
NO
NUKES FOR NUTCASES!
|
There
is only one type of person more evil than those who initiate
force: those
who erase all distinctions between those who initiate force and
those who defend against it.
|
|
"In
fact, more than half a century of experience shows that the U.N. is a theater
of hypocrisy, a sink of corruption, a street market of sordid bargains
and a seminary of cynicism. It is a place where mass-murdering heads of
state can stand tall and sell their votes to the highest bidder and where
crimes against humanity are rewarded."
-- eminent historian Paul Johnson, HERE
|
 |
|
THE
NATURE OF EVIL
|
THE
DESTROYERS OF THE MODERN WORLD
|
Putting
"That
'Gap
Between Rich & Poor' "
in perspective
|
"The fashionable idiocy that haters must have justifications is
one of those ideas that George Orwell said only an intellectual could believe
-- because no one else could be such a fool.." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell, HERE
"...in the much more virulent cases of hatred, masked as envy ... the
creature ... does not desire the value: it desires the value's destruction."--
Ayn Rand, HERE
"The purpose and motive of western civilization is life, the exact opposite
of the death-worship seen in nihilists of all stripes. Ours is the morality
of life and theirs the morality of death." -- John Lewis,
HERE
|
|
"SHAME
ON YOU AMERICAN-HATING LIBERALS"
-- Tony Parsons, London Daily Mirror, September 11, 2002 HERE
|
See: "We
are now paying the wages of the 1990s, our holiday from history ... The
question before us is very large and very simple: Can--and will--the civilized
part of humanity disarm the barbarians who would use the ultimate knowledge
for the ultimate destruction?" --
Dr.
Charles Krauthammer, HERE
|
"Civilization
does not have to perish. The brutes are winning only by default."
-- Ayn Rand
"The
only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-- Edmund Burke
"The
World is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those
who look at it without doing anything." -- Albert Einstein
|
The pacificists' arguments
amount to saying: since these massive threats
were brought upon us by our very own foreign policy errors, this means
(in
their minds, anyway) that we "therefore"
have no right or obligation to defuse those threats ourselves. (!)(?)(huh?) |
"The
fashionable idiocy that haters must have justifications is one of those
ideas that George Orwell said only an intellectual could believe -- because
no one else could be such a fool." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell |
"The
idea that if we leave the totally insane haters alone then they'll leave
us alone, and/or that we must wait for them to make the first nuclear or
super-smallpox strike -- is even more nuts." -- Bert Rand
|
"If
you believe only in 'containment' then you must be willing to live with
proliferation." -- Sen. John Sununu |
"The potential cost of doing nothing is clearly much greater
than the cost of doing something." -- Australian Prime Minister John Howard,
HERE.
|
The
fashionable idiocy that Gandhi-syle non-violent resistance would work against
the likes of Kim Jong-Il as it worked against the British, or that cold-war-style
deterrence would work against anonymous terrorists as it worked against
the Soviets, is not just neurotic, but totally reality-blind psychotic. |
"Against both undeterrables and undetectables pre-emption is
the only possible strategy. ... Unilateralism simply means that one
does not allow oneself to be held hostage to the will of others. ... There
were serious arguments against the war in Iraq, but the fact that France
did not approve was not one of them." -- Dr. Charles Krauthammer
|
Thecatastrophic
track record of pacifists with political power is analyzed
HERE.
|
See: "The more we show we're serious about challenging
states that harbor terrorists the more Pakistan and other nations are likely
to cooperate with Washington in tracking down and turning over the terrorists."HERE. |
"The
United States and Great Britain share a mission in the world beyond the
balance of power or the simple pursuit of interests. We seek the
advance of freedom and the peace that freedom brings." --
George W. Bush at Whitehall, Nov., 2003 |
|
Also see: 9-11:
The
Ultimate Philosophy Lesson
|
|
|
|