excerpts from EAT THE RICH: A Treatise on Economics  by P.J. O'Rourke

Chapter 6, "From Beatnick to Business Major, 
or, Taking Econ 101 for Kicks"
by P.J. O'Rourke

     So far, from an examination of the basic principles of economics, we've learned that things are scarce.  We knew that.  Fortunately, the less-basic principles of economics are more interesting.

1. The Market Is Never Wrong.

 A thing is worth what people will give for it, and it isn't worth anything else.  If you have some shares of Apple Computer and you go into the NASDAQ market offering those shares for $1,000 apiece, you may be brilliant.  Apple stock may be worth $1,000, easy.  And all the NASDAQ customers may be idiots for buying Apple at a mere thirty dollars.  A Macintosh is a much better computer than an IBM PC.  But, smart as you are and dumb as everybody else is, the market says your shares didn't sell.  And the market is right.

     Also, a thing may be "priceless."  You'd rather die than trade your Macintosh for an IBM.  But that's still a price, albeit a very high one.

2. So You Die.  Things Still Cost What They Cost.

     It's no use trying to fix prices.  To do so, you must have a product that can't be replaced, and you must have complete agreement among all the people who control that product.  They're greedy or they wouldn't have gotten into the agreement, and they're greedy so they sneak out of it.  This is what was wrong with Paul Samuelson's idea about crop restrictions in Chapter 1, and this is why the members of OPEC are still wandering around in their bathrobes, pestering camels.

     Any good drug dealer can tell you that to ensure a monopoly, you need force.  To ensure a large monopoly, you need the kind of force only a government usually has.  And it still doesn't work. ...

     The government of Cuba, with force aplenty at its disposal, decided that beef cost too much. The price of beef was fixed at a very low level, and all the beef disappeared from the government ration stores.  The people of Cuba had to hassle tourists to get dollars to buy beef on the black market, where the price of beef turned out to be what beef costs.

     When the price of something is fixed below market level, that something disappears from the legal market.  And when the price of something is fixed above market level, the opposite occurs.  Say the customers at suburban Wheat Depot won't pay enough for wheat.  The U.S. government may decide to buy that wheat at higher prices.  Suddenly there's wheat everywhere.  It turns out that people have bushels of it in the attic.  The government is up to its dull, gaping mouth in wheat.  The wheat has to be given away.  The recipients of free wheat in the Inner City Wheatfare Program hawk the wheat at traffic lights, and what they get for it is exactly what people are willing to give.

3. You Can't Get Something for Nothing.

     Everybody remembers this except politicians. ... 

-- excerpted from Chapter 6 of EAT THE RICH: A Treatise on Economics  by P.J. O'Rourke
Order the book here: http://FreedomKeys.com/bkecon.htm

| Prev | Index | Next |
"Without Productivity, there wouldn't be any economics, 
or any economic thinking, good or bad, or any pizza, or 
anything else.  We would sit around and stare at rocks, 
and maybe later have some for dinner. ... 
Wealth is based on productivity, and productivity is
exapandable.  In fact, productivity is fabulously expandable..."

"If we want the whole world to be rich, we need to start loving wealth. 
In the difference between poverty and plenty, the problem is the poverty 
and not the difference. Wealth is good.  ... wealth is not a world-wide 
round-robin of purse snatching, and ... 
the thing that makes you rich doesn't make me poor..."

"It was not reassuring to learn that the men who run the companies 
where our 401(k)s are invested have minds filled with junk from 
the attic of Paul A. Samuelson's Economics*. ... Professor Samuelson, 
who wrote the early editions by himself, turns out to be almost as 
much of a goof as my friends and I were in the 1960s." -- P.J. O'Rourke

You can find Chapter One in its entirety HERE.  And a tasty review HERE.
*"Economists could make such errors with impunity without any adverse 
effect on their careers because a positive attitude toward central planning 
was considered a sign of sophistication.  It was more important not to be 
considered anticommunist than to know what one was talking about. 
Even as late as 1989, Paul Samuelson delivered the obligatory paean to 
the Soviet economy in his economics textbook (Samuelson and Nordhaus
1989, 837)." -- Paul Craig Roberts, "My Time With Soviet Economics"

"What's even more amazing, Coase wrote his trailblazing article in 1974, 
but Samuelson continued to use the lighthouse as an ideal public good 
only the government could supply. After I publicly chided Samuelson 
for his failure to acknowledge Coase's revelation, Samuelson finally 
admitted the existence of private lighthouses 'in an earlier age,' in a 
footnote in the 16th edition of his textbook, but insisted that private 
lighthouses still encountered a 'free rider" problem.' -- Mark Skousen, 
"If You Build It - Privately - They Will Come"

"Samuelson is a great mathematician, but he knows little about 
economic activity.  He does not understand how the market works." 
-- Alan Ebenstein, "The Poverty of Samuelson's Economics"


 1  2 34 5 

page publisher