DEMOCRATS: WEAK ON DEFENSE

DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED TO SLASH INTELLIGENCE FUNDING

Are you happy they took over the Congress? 
The Democrats elected to Congress voted for the ultra-liberal San Franciscan Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House.  The Democrats elected to the Senate voted for "cut and run" Harry Reid for Majority Leader and vote to block pro-security judges nominated to the Supreme and appellate courts.

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted To Cut Intelligence Funding, Even After September 11th:


 
In 2003, 33 SENATE Democrats Voted To Withhold $50 Million In Intelligence Funding.  (H.R. 2658, CQ Vote #287: Motion Agreed To 62-34: R 51-0; D 11-33; I 0-1, 7/17/03)
In 2003, 44 SENATE Democrats Supported An Amendment That Would Have Transferred $300 Million Away From Intelligence Activities. (H.R. 2555, CQ Vote #294: Motion Agreed To 50-48: R 48-3; D 2-44; I 0-1, 7/23/03)
In 1996, 154 House Democrats Voted To Reduce The Total Amount Authorized By The Fiscal Year 1997 Intelligence Authorization By 4.9 Percent. (H.R. 3259, CQ Vote #187: Rejected 192-235: R 37-193; D 154-42; I 1-0, 5/22/96) 
In 1995, 40 SENATE Democrats Voted To Slash FBI Funding By $80 Million. (H.R. 2076, CQ Vote #480: Adopted 49-41: R 9-40; D 40-1, 9/29/95) 
In 1993, 120 House Democrats Voted To Cut Intelligence By $500 Million. (H.R. 2330, CQ Vote #393: Rejected: 134-299: R 13-159; D 120-14; I 1-0, 8/4/93) 

In 1989, 31 House Democrats Voted Against Authorizing Appropriations For Intelligence And Intelligence-Related Activities Of The U.S. Government For The CIA And Related Agencies. (H.R. 2748, CQ Vote #288: Passed 369-31: R 161-8; D 208-23, 10/12/89)

  • "American supremacy is the greatest threat to the world today." -- George Soros, MoveOn.org's billionaire benefactor

  •  
  • "Now it's our party! We bought it, we own it!"-- Radical leftist Eli Pariser, one of the organizers and leaders of MoveOn.org, referring to the Democratic Party.

  •  
  • "Last fall, the far-Left Nation magazine declared a purge – an exercise at which the Left excels – against any Democrat unwilling to cut-and-run." -- Ben Johnson, 8/9/06 [and, together with all the other left-wing nutcases, they beat Sen. Joe Lieberman, the last of the strong-on-security Democrats, in his Senatorial primary]

  •  
  • The Democrats still insist that acts of terrorism be treated as law enforcement problems (just as they did during the Clinton administration) instead of acts of war, even though that always means assigning attorneys and legal defense to captured terrorists and revealing to them AND THEIR ENTIRE NETWORKS all the evidence against them (which usually reveals HOW THAT EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED).  In a very real sense, therefore, they really ARE "The terrorists' rights party."

  •  
  • "There was no plan on Al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration." -- Richard Clarke, here: http://tinyurl.com/2ntog

  •  
  • Now about that hysteria over "warrantless searches":  You can't even WRITE, let alone issue, a warrant to look for patterns in communications, a warrant for the purpose of  eventually finding unexpected patterns that might appear out of the blue, like "liquids" mentioned along with "airplanes."  It was THIS type of pattern recognition that allowed U.S. Intelligence agencies to alert the British about the latest terrorist airliner plot just before a radical-leftist appellate judge (nominated by Democrat Jimmy Carter -- and confirmed by the Senate ONLY BECAUSE DEMOCRATS WERE IN THE MAJORITY at the time) ruled that terrorist- monitoring is unconstitutional.

  •  
  • "A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest.  The laws of necessity, of self- preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation.  To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property, and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means." -- Thomas Jefferson to John Colvin, 1810 

  •  
  • "The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has published a report that makes one wonder if they know who really is the enemy. ... In both houses of the U.S. Congress the committees and sub-committees which used to concern themselves with threats to national security by alien and subversive groups have been closed down.  There is, however, a Senate Committee to ride herd on our intelligence gathering agencies to see that they number one, operate lawfully, and number two, effectively.  So far they've only concerned themselves with number one." -- Ronald Reagan, June 15, 1977 (when both houses of Congress were controlled by DEMOCRATS)

  •  
  • "In a very real sense, the reason September eleven of  '01 happened is because right behind me about five blocks the [Democrat-controlled] Frank Church committee hearings in the early 1970's and the [Democrat] Carter administration later in the 1970's largely destroyed the CIA's operations directorate." -- Tom Clancy on Kudlow and Cramer, 9/2/03 

  •  
  • "Actually you can trace our failures in stopping global terror all the way back to Jimmy Carter and Democratic Senator Frank Church." -- Neal Boortz, 9/1/03

  •  
  • "Carter helped to usher in the 'Iranian Revolution' of 1979 by leaning on the [pro- U.S.] Shah of Iran to 'release political prisoners'  [which ultimately led to his downfall and his replacement by the Islamofascist mullahs and ayatollahs]." -- Larry Elder, 8/24/06

  •  
  • The first country to steal oilfields developed by western companies' advanced technology (which gave those companies rightful ownership) was Iran in 1951.  The inaction and silence (and possibly tacit approval) on the part of Prime Minister Attlee [Labor Party] in the U.K., with the acquiescence of President Truman [Democrat] in the U.S. (and the invisible, extremely slow and unnecessarily secretive response on the part of their eventual successors) set the stage for all the other Muslim countries in the middle east to eagerly follow suit, eventually giving to pathetic primitive barbarians the ability to purchase nuclear weapons (let alone computers) and spread unspeakably evil philosophies around the world.

  •  
  • ALWAYS REMEMBER WHO SAID THIS (and why we have his country surrounded): "...Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?...you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved..." -- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "elected" leader of Iran

  •  
  • Al-Zawahiri's former student defects and says, "Stop it!" to the West here:  http://snipurl.com/120df 
Now here's something ELSE scary:   As Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 3rd in line for the Presidency. 

YOU MIGHT AS WELL JUMP RIGHT NOW TO THE EXCELLENT EDITORIAL: "97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And Can't Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime"  HERE: http://snipurl.com/xror
 

DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED AGAINST FUNDING FOR OUR TROOPS FIGHTING THE WAR ON TERROR
Many of them have a very low regard for them anyway.  Are you glad they took over the Congress?

Democrats Have Voted Against Billions In Funding To Support Our Troops In Iraq And Afghanistan:
In 2005, 54 House Democrats Voted Against Over $37 Billion In Funding For Military Operations In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 1268, CQ Vote #161: Adopted 368-58: R 225-3; D 143-54; I 0-1, 5/5/05)
In 2005, 39 House Democrats Voted Against Over $53 Billion In Funding For Military Operations And Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 1268, CQ Vote #77: Passed 388-43: R 226-3; D 162-39; I 0-1, 3/16/05)
In 2003, 11 SENATE Democrats Voted Against $87 Billion For Military Operations And Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (S. 1689, CQ Vote #400: Passed 87-12: R 50-0; D 37-11; I 0-1, 10/17/03) 
In 2003, 115 House Democrats Voted Against $87 Billion For Military Operations and Reconstruction In Iraq And Afghanistan. (H.R. 3289, CQ Vote #601: Adopted 298-121: R 216-5; D 82-115; I 0-1; 10/31/03) 
Study THIS from the Democrats' 2006 choice for President:

On Dec. 4th of last year John Kerry told "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer, "...there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women..."
 
 

 DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED AGAINST WEAPONS USED IN THE WAR ON TERROR
Are you glad they took over the Congress?

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Funding The B-2 Spirit (Stealth Bomber):

Democrats Voted Against Funding The Stealth Bomber At Least Eighteen Times, In 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, And 1997.  (H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #203: Rejected 29-71: R 2-43; D 27-28, 9/26/89; H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #310: Motion Rejected 29-68: R 3-41; D 26-27, 11/17/89; S. 2884, CQ Vote #208: Rejected 43-56: R 8-36; D 35-20, 8/2/90; S. 2884, CQ Vote #209: Rejected 45-53: R 9-34; D 36-19, 8/2/90; S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90; H.R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; H.R. 4739, CQ Vote #320: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; S. 1507, CQ Vote #174: Rejected 42-57: R 7-36; D 35-21, 8/1/91; H.R. 2521, CQ Vote #206: Motion Agreed To 51-48: R 36-7; D 15-41, 9/25/91; S. 2403, CQ Vote #85: Adopted 61-38: R 7-36; D 54-2, 5/6/92; H.R. 4990, CQ Vote #108: Adopted 90-9: R 34-9; D 56-0, 5/21/92; S. 3114, CQ Vote #216: Rejected 45-53: R 8-35; D 37-18, 9/18/92; S. 2182, CQ Vote #179: Rejected 45-55: R 8-36; D 37-19, 7/1/94; H.R. 2126, CQ Vote #579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34, 11/16/95; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #608: Adopted 51-43: R 47-2; D 4-41, 12/19/95; S. 1124, CQ Vote #5: Adopted 56-34: R 42-3; D 14-31, 1/26/96; H.R. 3230, CQ Vote #279: Adopted 73-26: R 50-3; D 23-23, 9/10/96; H.R. 1119, CQ Vote #228: Rejected 209-216: R 60-163; D 148-53; I 1-0, 6/23/97)

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Funding The F/A-18 Hornet & Super Hornet:

Democrats Voted Against Funding The F/A-18 Hornet & Super Hornet At Least Nine Times, In 1990, 1995, 1996, And 1997.  (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90; H.R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; H.R. 4739, CQ Vote #320: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #399: Passed 64-34: R 50-3; D 14-31, 9/6/95; H.R. 2126, CQ Vote #579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34, 11/16/95; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #608: Adopted 51-43: R 47-2; D 4-41, 12/19/95; S. 1124, CQ Vote #5: Adopted 56-34: R 42-3; D 14-31, 1/26/96; H.R. 3230, CQ Vote #279: Adopted 73-26: R 50-3; D 23-23, 9/10/96; S. 936, CQ Vote #172: Rejected 19-79: R 1-54; D 18-25, 7/11/97)

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Funding The Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV):

Democrats Voted Against Funding UAVs At Least Four Times, In 1995 And 1996. (H.R. 2126, CQ Vote #579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34, 11/16/95; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #608: Adopted 51-43: R 47-2; D 4-41, 12/19/95; S. 1745, CQ Vote #187: Passed 68-31: R 50-2; D 18-29, 7/10/96; H.R. 3230, CQ Vote #279: Adopted 73-26: R 50-3; D 23-23, 9/10/96)

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Funding The Tomahawk Cruise Missile:

Democrats Voted Against Funding The Tomahawk Cruise Missile At Least Four Times, In 1990, 1995 And 1996.  (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90; H.R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #399: Passed 64-34: R 50-3; D 14-31, 9/6/95; H.R. 3230, CQ Vote #279: Adopted 73-26: R 50-3; D 23-23, 9/10/96)

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Funding The LHD Helicopter Carrier:

Democrats Voted Against Funding The LHD Helicopter Carrier At Least Five Times, In 1990, 1995 And 1996.  (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90; H.R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R 37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90; S. 1087, CQ Vote #397: Passed 62-35: R 48-4; D 14-31, 9/5/95; H.R. 1530, CQ Vote #608: Adopted 51-43: R 47-2; D 4-41, 12/19/95; S. 1124, CQ Vote #5: Adopted 56-34: R 42-3; D 14-31, 1/26/96)
 
 

DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED AGAINST CRITICAL DEFENSE FUNDING
Are you glad they took over the Congress?

Democrats Have Repeatedly Voted Against Critical Defense Spending Bills:
In 2006, 30 House Democrats Voted Against Over $512 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 5122, CQ Vote #145: Passed 396-31: R 227-1; D 168-30; I 1-0, 5/11/06)
  • This Funding Included Almost $17 Billion For Military Construction And Family Housing. (H.R. 5122, CQ Vote #145: Passed 396-31: R 227-1; D 168-30; I 1-0, 5/11/06)  
In 2006, 52 House Democrats Voted Against Over $67 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 4939, CQ Vote #65: Passed 348-71: R 204-19; D 143-52; I 1-0, 3/16/06)
In 2005, 37 House Democrats Voted Against Over $440 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 1815, CQ Vote #222: Passed 390-39: R 225-2; D 164-37; I 1-0, 5/25/05)
  • This Funding Included $108 Billion For Defense Personnel And Over $12 Billion For Military Construction And Family Housing. (H.R. 1815, CQ Vote #222: Passed 390-39: R 225-2; D 164-37; I 1-0, 5/25/05) 
In 2004, 33 House Democrats Voted Against Over $447 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 4200, CQ Vote #206: Passed 391-34: R 221-1; D 169-33; I 1-0, 5/20/04)
In 2003, 66 House Democrats Voted Against Over $400 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 1588, CQ Vote #221: Passed 361-68: R 223-1: D 138-66; I 0-1, 5/22/03) 
In 2002, 56 House Democrats Voted Against Over $383 Billion In Defense Funding. (H.R. 4546, CQ Vote #158: Passed 359-58: R 212-1; D 146-56; I 1-1, 5/10/02) 
  • This Funding Included A 4.7 Percent Pay Increase For Military Personnel. (H.R. 4546, CQ Vote #158: Passed 359-58: R 212-1; D 146-56; I 1-1, 5/10/02) 

OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS, DEMOCRATS HAVE REPEATEDLY VOTED AGAINST MISSILE DEFENSE
Are you glad they took over the Congress?

During The Bush Administration, Democrats Have Voted Against Missile Defense At Least Nine Times:
In 2006, 130 House Democrats Voted To Cut Over $9 Billion Dollars From The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H. Con. Res. 376, CQ Vote #155: Rejected 131-294: R 0-229; D 130-65; I 1-0; 5/17/06)
In 2006, 117 House Democrats Voted To Limit The Deployment Of Ground-Based Defense Systems And To Halt The Deployment Of Space-Based Missile Interceptors. (H.R. 5122, CQ Vote #142: Rejected 124-301: R 6-221; D 117-80; I 1-0; 5/11/06) 
In 2005, 34 SENATE Democrats Voted To Cut $50 Million From Missile Defense. (S. 1042, CQ Vote #311: Rejected 37-60: R 2-52; D 34-8; I 1-0, 11/8/05)
In 2005, 132 House Democrats Voted To Reduce Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H. Con. Res. 95, CQ Vote #85: Rejected 134-292: R 1-225; D 132-67; I 1-0, 3/17/05)
In 2004, 43 SENATE Democrats Supported An Amendment Offered By Sen. Levin (D-MI) And Voted To Cut $515 Million From The Missile Defense Agency’s Ground-Based Midcourse Interceptors. (S. 2400, CQ Vote #133: Rejected 44-56: R 0-51; D 43-5; I 1-0, 6/22/04)
In 2004, 118 House Democrats Voted To Reduce Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H. Con. Res. 393, CQ Vote #88: Rejected 119-302: R 0-220; D 118-82; I 1-0, 3/25/04)
In 2003, 66 House Democrats Voted Against A Bill That Included Over $9 Billion For The Anti-Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 1588, CQ Vote #221: Passed 361-68: R 223-1; D 138-66; I 0-1, 5/22/03)
In 2002, 56 House Democrats Voted Against A Bill That Included $7.8 Billion For Missile Defense Systems. (H.R. 4546, CQ Vote #158: Passed 359-58: R 212-1; D 146-56; I 1-1, 5/10/02)
In 2002, 156 House Democrats Voted To Block Funding For Space Based Missile Defense Programs. (H.R. 4546, CQ Vote # 145: Rejected 159-253: R 2-206; D 156-46; I 1-1, 5/9/02) 

 
 

WHEN DEMOCRATS WERE IN CONTROL OF CONGRESS BEFORE, THEY CUT BILLIONS FROM MISSILE DEFENSE
Are you glad they took over the Congress?

In The Early 90’s, Democrats Cut Missile Defense Funding At Least Seven Times:
In 1994, 38 SENATE Democrats Voted To Cut $513 Million From The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (S. Con. Res. 63, CQ Vote #64: Rejected 40-59: R 2-42; D 38-17, 3/22/94)
In 1994, 139 House Democrats Voted To Reduce Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 4301, CQ Vote #179: Rejected 155-271: R 15-160; D 139-11; I 1-0, 5/18/94)
In 1993, 44 SENATE Democrats Were Successful In Cutting Funds From The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (S. 1298, CQ Vote #251: Adopted 50-48: R 6-36; D 44-12, 9/9/93)
In 1993, 150 House Democrats Voted To Reduce Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 3400, CQ Vote #610: Rejected 184-248: R 33-139; D 150-10; I 1-0, 11/22/93)
In 1993, 185 House Democrats Voted To Cut $200 Million In Funding From The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 2401, CQ Vote #414: Rejected 202-227: R 16-156; D 185-71; I 1-0, 9/8/93) 
In 1993, 251 House Democrats Were Successful In Defeating A $467 Million Increase In Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 2401, CQ Vote #413: Rejected 118-312: R 113-60; D 5-251; I 0-1, 9/8/93) 
In 1993, 153 House Democrats Voted To Cut $1.5 Billion In Funding For The Ballistic Missile Defense Program. (H.R. 2401, CQ Vote #412: Rejected 160-272: R 6-167; D 153-10; I 1-0, 9/8/93)
During The Reagan Administration, A Majority Of Democrats Voted Against Missile Defense:
During The Reagan And George H. W. Bush Administrations, A Majority Of Democrats Voted Against Missile Defense At Least 14 Times. (S. 1160, CQ Vote #101: Rejected 36-59: R 1-49; D 35-10, 6/4/85; S. 1160, CQ Vote #103: Rejected 33-62: R 28-22; D 5-40, 6/4/85; H.J. Res. 465, CQ Vote #365: Motion Agreed To 64-32: R 49-2; D 15-30, 12/10/85; H.R. 4515, CQ Vote #122: Ruled Non-Germane 45-47: R 7-42; D 38-5, 6/6/86; S. 2638, CQ Vote #176: Motion Agreed To 50-49: R 41-11; D 9-38, 8/5/86; S. 2638, CQ Vote #177: Rejected 49-50: R 10-42; D 39-8, 8/5/86; S. 1174, CQ Vote #248: Motion Agreed To 58-38: R 8-37; D 50-1, 9/17/87; S. 1174, CQ Vote #259: Motion Agreed To 51-50: R 37-9; D 13-41, With Vice President Bush Casting A Yea Vote, 9/22/87; S. 1352, CQ Vote #148: Motion Agreed To 50-47: R 37-6; D 13-41, 7/27/89; H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #202: Rejected 34-66: R 27-18; D 7-48, 9/26/89; H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #213: Adopted 53-47: R 39-6; D 14-41, 9/28/89; S. 2884, CQ Vote #223: Adopted 54-44: R 2-42; D 52-2, 8/4/90; S. 2884, CQ Vote #225: Motion Agreed To 56-41: R 39-4; D 17-37, 8/4/90; S. 2884, CQ Vote #226: Motion Agreed To 54-43: R 37-6; D 17-37, 8/4/90)

 
 

DEMOCRATS ARE CARELESS ABOUT NORTH KOREA’S MISSILES
Are you glad they took over the Congress?

If Democrats Succeeded In Cutting Missile Defense The U.S. Would Not Be Able To Defend Itself Against North Korea’s Missiles:
The Wall Street Journal: “The Navy had at least one ship-based Aegis missile-defense system deployed off the Korean coast, with a potential to shoot down a North Korean missile.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06)
  • The Wall Street Journal: The Aegis cruisers have successfully shot down missiles in seven of eight tests in recent years, and could become an important player in protecting allies and U.S. forces against regional missile threats.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06) 
  • The Wall Street Journal: “The U.S. is also dispatching PAC-3s, a more sophisticated version of the Patriot anti-missile system, to Japan. This kind of capability adds to the credibility of the U.S. deterrent, reassures allies and enhances American influence.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06) 
  • The Wall Street Journal: “Virtually none of this would exist had Democrats succeeded over the years in their many attempts to kill missile defenses.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06) 

  •  
  • The Wall Street Journal: “[W]ith President Clinton in office, Democrats starved the program of funds.” (Editorial, “The Taepodong Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/21/06) 
-- excerpted from http://www.gop.com/weakandwrong/#demanc

REMEMBER: As Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 3rd in line for the Presidency. 

The takeover of the Democratic Party by soft-on- terrorism appeaseniks was demonstrated by the loss of strong-on-security Joe Lieberman in the primaries.  "America's national security is the lowest priority on the Democratic Party agenda." -- David Horowitz 
And remember, it was John Kerry who wanted to give nuclear fuel to the fanatic mullahs who run Iran (!) 

Are you glad they took over the Congress?

See: RECKLESS DISREGARD: How Liberal Democrats Undercut Our Military, Endanger Our Soldiers, and Jeopardize Our Security by Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson here:http://makeashorterlink.com/?K117225DD

See: How the North Koreans Suckered Carter & Clinton into Putting them into the Nuclear Reactor Business here: http://FreedomKeys.com/agreedframework.htm

The capture of Bin Laden was blocked several times during the Clinton administration, including four times by national security adviser Sandy Berger alone.  See:  http://snipurl.com/w98a

See: "In his eight years in office, President Clinton's military response to the terrorist threats was negligible and did nothing to seriously address the problem, instead following a de facto course of drift, which allowed the terrorist network to grow in size and strength." here: http://snipurl.com/w9wz

See why former FBI Director Louis Freeh thinks the 9/11 Commission deserves an "incomplete" grade here:  http://snipurl.com/w99a

See how the "wall of separation" which Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick helped to build between the FBI and the CIA during the Clinton administration made it virtually impossible for U.S. authorities to stop Ahmed Rassam and other terrorists, including on 9/11 here:  http://snipurl.com/w9a4

See how "Jamie Gorelick, a member of the September 11 commission, has a major conflict-of-interest problem." here: http://snipurl.com/w9al

See "WIRETAP"here: 
http://www.citizensunited.org/news/Read.aspx?ID=37

See the differences between the edited AND unedited versions of ABC's 'The Path to 9/11' here:
http://snipurl.com/w8as

See "The Anti-Americans" here: 
http://FreedomKeys.com/anti-americans.htm

Also see "Hypocrisy on Iraq" here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE

"The Secret History of the Iraq War" here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/secrethistory.htm

"MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT IRAQ" here: http://www.thetruthaboutiraq.org/myths.htm

And "WHY IRAQ?" here:
http://FreedomKeys.com/whyiraq.htm

"There is something terribly wrong with people seeking to demean and weaken the president in war time, thereby strengthening our country's enemies. As a result of the language and tactics of those opposed to our presence in Iraq, our enemies have been emboldened..." -- Ed Koch, former Democratic Mayor of New York City, here: http://snipurl.com/vsf0

"If Bill Clinton had been a virgin, he would still have been the most immoral president in this country's history. In exchange for illegal campaign contributions from the government of China, he allowed the Chinese to buy American technology, which now makes them capable of hitting American cities with nuclear missiles." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell,  here: http://www.freedomkeys.com/slimeball.htm

"Carter and Clinton saw so many sides of every issue that what appeared to their eyes was not a unified image but a view at the sub-atomic level--a pixilated version of the big picture that registers trees instead of forest. ... Carter, meanwhile, continues to write essays indicating he has no idea that North Korea [WHICH THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION BUILT NUCLEAR PLANTS FOR after Carter got them to pledge no bomb-making] began breaking its pledge to him the moment his plane took off." -- Joel Engel, here: http://snipurl.com/x4jx

"In order for Democrats to be elected, they have to hide who they really are." -- Neal Boortz, here: http://tinyurl.com/yef8mk

Also see: The good things the 2003 tax cuts have brought here: http://FreedomKeys.com/2003taxcuts.htm

And: http://freedomkeys.com/beforeyouvote.htm
 

and please PASS IT ALONG ---------->

-- You can make a cleaner copy by going to this page
     and copying it or sending it as-is: 
http://FreedomKeys.com/demsondefense.htm